FCKH8’s “F-Bomb Princess” Video Isn’t Offensive… It’s Exploitative

F-Bomb Feminism
GenderGirlsSocial MediaWomen's Rights 22 Comments

[UPDATE: As a result of the spirited discussions her piece has inspired, and feedback it has received, the author had a few additional thoughts to share. You can see her addendum here, below the original piece.]

By Rebecca Hains – Yesterday, for-profit T-shirt company FCKH8.com released a video calledF-Bombs for Feminism: Potty-Mouthed Princesses Use Bad Word for Good Cause.” The video features five angry girls, ages 6 to 13, who express outrage at society’s sexist treatment of girls and women while decked out in princess attire.

The video opens with the girls sweetly cooing, “Pretty!” while posing in their gowns and tiaras. But three seconds later, they switch gears and shout: “What the fuck? I’m not some pretty fuckin’ helpless princess in distress. I’m pretty fuckin’ powerful and ready for success. So what is more offensive? A little girl saying ‘fuck,’ or the fucking unequal and sexist way society treats girls and women?”

F-Bomb Feminism2

As the video progresses, the girls review the ongoing issues of inequality, systematic discrimination, and sexual violence faced by women in the U.S. They pepper these facts with more f-bombs, of course.

This combination of pretty pink princesses and relentless use of the f-word is potent and clearly calculated to provoke. And provoke it has: For the shock value alone, everybody’s talking about this video.

F-Bomb Feminism3

But in all the conversation about whether the video is offensive, we need to also consider the ad from a media literate perspective and consider FCKH8’s corporate interests. Was it right for FCKH8 to script a slew of swear words into an advertisement featuring young children?

If we follow the money and consider FCKH8’s motivations in producing “F-Bombs for Feminism,” it’s pretty clear that FCKH8 is in the wrong. Although the video purports to be “for [a] good cause”—presumably, to raise awareness of sexism—what they’re really promoting is their t-shirts. By putting FCKH8’s bottom line ahead of girls’ best interests, FCKH8 is being exploitative.

F-Bomb Feminism4

In fact, “F-Bombs for Feminism” betrays a social media marketing perspective devoid of ethics. The video’s ethos is so steeped in a “Generation Like” mindset that having the video widely “liked” and “shared” is clearly what matters most—resulting in the company’s decision to push girls as young as age six into the roles of cultural provocateurs.

As a social media marketing strategy, it worked brilliantly. The video went viral almost instantaneously, prompting heavy traffic to FCKH8.com. There, t-shirts proclaiming “This is what a feminist looks like” and “Girls just want to have fun-damental rights”—as worn by the women appearing at the video’s end, of course—are up for sale.

F-Bomb Feminism5

Sadly, despite what major corporations and indie brands alike would have us believe, empowerment can neither be bottled nor sold. Commodification of feminism is not empowerment, and FCKH8 is not empowering girls or women through this video. Instead, they’re using girls as a means to a commercial end: to raise awareness of sexism to sell their t-shirts.

How ironic that a company that positions itself as feminist has no problem commodifying children in this way. Where is their sense of corporate responsibility? The ends don’t justify the means, and they never should have produced this ad.

F-Bomb Feminism6

I would feel differently if a video along these lines had been produced by girls as a way to find an audience for their authentic voices. If a group of young girls were passionate about combatting sexism in the U.S. and had decided to produce a video to raise awareness on the matter, and realized they could get their message out by swearing up a storm, more power to them—well, I’d applaud them for their creativity and media savvy.

But that’s not the case here. This video was scripted and slickly produced by a t-shirt company that evidently has no qualms about exploiting girls who are too young to understand the implications of the script they’re bringing to life.

So, my advice is this. Let’s stop debating whether we’re offended by little girls saying “fuck” and focus on the heart of the matter, instead: By putting adult words into children’s mouths, FCKH8 is exploiting girls in this advertisement. End of story.

UPDATE: Addendum Posted Thursday, October 23, 2014

Since I wrote this piece yesterday, I’ve had some really terrific conversations with people who care about this issue—both with those who love the video and those who are critical of it. A few points I’d like to share:

1. Some readers have asked why I feel it’s a problem that FCKH8 is a for-profit t-shirt company. After all, they’re donating some of their profits to deserving charities and delivering cool tee shirts to people, right? Wrong. The slogans found on the FCKH8 t-shirts were appropriated from other feminist nonprofits. For example, the Feminist Majority Foundation has been selling “This is what a feminist looks like” tees since at least the mid-1990s. So despite their promises to support charities with their t-shirt sales, FCKH8 is actually siphoning money away from feminist charities by stealing their ideas.

Furthermore, quality charities have refused to take FCKH8’s money in the past, because FCKH8 is incredibly problematic. They’ve been accused widely of being transphobic (as a quick google search will show), and their anti-racist work is of dubious merit. For example, their response to Ferguson raised so much ire in the anti-racist community that Race Forward—one of the charities originally listed on FCKH8’s page—announced publicly that they were refusing donations from the company.

So to those who are saying that FCKH8 is a company that’s doing it’s best to promote social justice, and we should cut them some slack? No FCKHing way.

2. Some readers have argued that the girls aren’t being exploited because they’re old enough to understand the concepts in the video. But as well-regarded educational psychologist Lori Day weighed in below in the comments,

“The older girls probably understand, but the younger ones have gotten an acting gig. They probably have stage parents all too happy to put them on the internet. The ad could have been more effective without using the girls in this way and by letting their authentic voices shine through. Sometimes less is more, and this is one of those times. I found this ad to be clickbait on top of a vehicle for selling t-shirts, and that’s ok for adults if they want to do that, but 6-year-olds? I don’t think so. I’ve worked with kids that age for 26 years. They can understand some aspects of sexism, but much of this video is above their heads, the f-bombs were more than provocative–they were exploitative.”

3. Some readers are insisting that anyone concerned about the video isn’t outraged enough about the structural inequalities described in the ad. However, outrage is not a zero-sum game—even though FCKH8 did some very savvy and disingenuous work in framing it that way, to pit viewers against one another. Think about it: It’s possible to be completely outraged by structural inequality AND ALSO find the video outrageous and/or exploitative.

4. Another commenter, Eliyanna Kaiser, raised a point in the thread below that I’d like to highlight, as it’s an important one to consider. She writes:

“Also, remember that diapered, African American Nebraska toddler who was the subject of a viral video that his family took (and foolishly posted) where he cussed up a storm? It wasn’t for a “cause” (or a for-profit enterprise), but that little boy was taken away from his mother by child services. It’s really weird how this is all meta-debate about whether or not it’s cute and empowering to watch little girls swear or whether it’s exploitative of them — but in the context of poor people not doing it for profit it’s the kind of shit that gets your kid taken away.”

In other words, there’s race, class, and consumerist privilege at play in the fact that FCKH8 expects to be lauded for having kids play-act in ways that gets actual kids of colors removed from their parents’ homes.

5. The blog “The Belle Jar” made a post that elaborates in greater detail as to why the FCKH8 ad is exploitative, and I highly recommend it. Here’s a preview:

“There is for sure nothing feminist about having girls as young as six years old discussing rape and sexual assault; I would hope that at that age, most kids have never even heard the word rape, let alone had to recite rote facts on it for an audience of thousands, maybe even millions. I feel sick that these children are being taught about subjects like rape just so that a t-shirt company can make a provocative advertisement. The point that especially crosses the line between “this is problematic” and “I want to flip a table” is the moment where the five little girls spout off the statistic that one in five women will be raped in their lifetime, and then ask which of them it will be. Having a little girl demand to know if she’ll be raped just so that you can sell a few shirts is so far beyond the realm of what should be acceptable that I have no words for it.”

6. Still think there’s nothing of merit to complain about in the FCKH8 “F-Bombs for Feminism” ad? Check out this great list that reader Deanne Carson devised and posted publicly in the Women You Should Know Facebook thread about my post:

Deanna Carson

Thanks for reading and engaging, everyone—this has been a really informative conversation.

P.S. I’d like to thank The Christian Science Monitor and Women You Should Know for cross-posting this piece, and Bitch magazine for sharing this post with in yesterday’s Feminist News Round-Up.

About The Contributor

Dr. Rebecca Hains is a children’s media culture expert. She is a professor of advertising and media studies at Salem State University in Salem, Mass., where she is affiliated with the Center for Childhood and Youth Studies. Her research focuses on girls and media.

Rebecca Hains_BookShe is the author of The Princess Problem: Guiding Our Girls Through the Princess-Obsessed Years and Growing Up With Girl Power: Girlhood On Screen and in Everyday Life.

Via her blog and facebook page, Rebecca offers her expert commentary on parenting children in a media-saturated world and on topics related to body image, stereotypical beauty ideals, sex role stereotypes, and gendered marketing.

  • Samantha

    I’m not totally sure I agree with this argument. It’s true that this clothing company doesn’t even donate a portion of it’s profits to feminist organizations, or lgbt, another sub-section of clothing on their site, but one could (and I’m sure they do) make the argument that drawing attention to these issues is a form of outreach in itself.

    In an age when part of what we’re combatting is fear and when we have witnessed what pubic opinion can do to sway the laws in our country– with gay marriage– how can we reasonably say that raising the public profile of these issues isn’t a public service?

    I also am not sure that it matters whether or not they are profiting off of this message– plenty of people and companies profit off of things much worse than this, and no one questions whether they were “right” to do it. (Case in point, violent video games). Is it not better to make money off of something that increases awareness of a terrible social issue? Must it be 100% altruistic to be worth doing?

    So maybe what’s shocking isn’t little girls cursing– the morality of which is certainly debatable– but that the morality of this ad is more offensive than the things they are saying. It’s true that they probably don’t understand the completely disturbing things they are pointing to. On the other hand, words are just words. These issues are going to have real impact on these little girls’ lives– more so than shooting an ad when they were seven or thirteen ever could. I’m surprised that the only takeaway is that the people making this video are making a profit and that little kids cursing is traumatic. And logistically, I’m sure those little girls’ parents consented, and that they were either paid or did it because they believe in the issues they’re dropping F-bombs about.

  • David Jay

    All the crap feminists give corporations for exploiting women to make money, yet exploiting children is okay? Some messed up priorities and yes this is EXACTLY what exploitation is. How much money did the exploitative parents make pimping out their children to this company? What happened to days with morals where children( male or female) were punished for being disrespectful?

    • You realize that this is a feminist website and they explicitly said this was not okay, right?

      That kind of undercuts your first point.

      • David Jay

        Eh, I appreciate that THIS feminist website criticized it, but MANY others included Jezebel, Upworthy, etc. have praised the video as groundbreaking and comments praising it getting 500+ likes, that is unacceptable. Okay, so you wanna pull the NAFALT argument, I can dig it, fair enough. However, in doing that, you also need to accept the ” not all men” argument as valid also.

        • PJ

          Not sure what you’re reading or where you’re getting your “facts,” but neither Jezebel nor Upworthy praised this video.

          In fact, as for the latter, they have a disclaimer (“FCKH8 is definitely a far-from-perfect organization, and boy, do we share some of the concerns our audience might have with the organization itself regarding its practices.”).

          Here are their pieces so you can “reread” them: http://jezebel.com/little-girls-cussing-for-feminism-would-be-great-if-it-1648888649 http://www.upworthy.com/nothing-more-shocking-than-little-girls-dropping-the-f-bomb-except-the-words-that-come-after

          • David Jay

            You might wanna take a look at the comment section of both where the feminists subscribers to those sites cheer on that idea and how it is men’s fault(as usual) that we have the cultural idea that young children should not curse. Okay so they officially came out against it, but the feminists that follow them love it. Also, Upworthy posted it on their page for click bait to gain views even though they( allegedly) didn’t like the video. If they truly didn’t like the video they would not have posted it and given it more credibility.

          • PJ

            Not interested in the comments sections, which are likely filled with soap box rants. I was simply disputing what you stated, since it was untrue, “Jezebel, Upworthy, etc. have praised the video as groundbreaking…” It’s just always better to have facts straight, instead of using erroneous info or assumptions as fodder for an argument. One additional point of clarification for you… “not all feminists” are alike nor do we all view things in exactly the same way.

          • Kes

            That’s rather like saying, David Jay, that feminists must be against feminists because your comment attacking feminists was posted on a feminist website. …

        • Well it’s a combination of messaging that is on point with a use of kids that misses the mark. Some people catch the former while missing the latter.

          It definitely brings up interesting conversations, though. I just wish they didn’t exploit the kids to do it.

  • Ginger Rogers

    This is BOTH OFFENSIVE AND EXPLOITIVE! Those little girls just lost their childhood and the makers of the video should be tried for child abuse!

  • Susanne Kummel

    I do think you’re guilty of ageism when you presume that the girls in the video are “too young to understand the implications.” I’ve been talking with my daughter about feminism and empowerment all her life. She’s 10 and I guarantee that she understood the message here when I showed her the video.

    • e

      i don’t think the author was referring to the implications of the message of feminism and empowerment. the way i read it, she was referring to the implications of the message that it’s okay to exploit girls as long as we say it’s for their own good.
      i’m sure your educated and well-parented 10 year old could understand that, but i’m not sure about the average 6 or 7 year old.

  • Guest

    I am not disagreeing… BUT- why doesn’t the author of this article mention that FCKH8.com states that they donate $5 a shirt to community organizations pertaining to the “cause” the shirt promotes? I think a much better article would explore this fact… and let us know if they are indeed donating AND how much profit they are making. I believe this is the same company that profited off the Mike Brown shooting? Let us know about the DETAILS Bust mag! We are smart readers and want more in-depth articles!

  • scrabblelover

    This is very sad to see – but so are little girl beauty contests.

  • Pingback: I’m a fan FCKH8’s ‘F-Bomb Princess’ viral video | Reel Girl()

  • Dan

    I have to take issue with Deanne Carson’s assertion that men have no right to lead the charge in eradicating sexism. Why the hell not? As people greater than myself have pointed out, sexism is everyone’s problem, but she seems to feel that feminism is an “us-vs-them” proposition.

  • medievalrants

    What are the odds the shirts are made by girls in sweatshops? I can’t find info on their site where the shirts come from.

  • Informative Stats

    Yet another thing wrong with this ad that no one seems to have picked up on is that it’s just a ripoff of the music video for Courtenay Love’s ‘Mono’ – which also featured little girls in princess dresses (literally) smashing gender stereotypes. Difference being I’d imagine the girls on the music video shoot still have fond memories of being all dressed up and playing with power tools a decade later. Whereas, learning about rape from an exploitative ad director when you’re only six? Maybe not so much.

  • Colorado RedTraci

    The conversation you all are trying to have has turned into a conversation about what horrible parents these people must be to let their little girls participate in this video. Please someone contact DCFS.

  • Guest

    To say these kids were exploited then one must assume you think all child actors/actresses are exploited as well. Just because they are swearing in the ad is a moot point. I for one, loved swearing as a kid (yes as early as six), and I would have loved the opportunity to swear on camera instead of hiding from my parents too scared I would get in trouble for using a naughty word. It’s unfortunate that the keyboard warrior “WON’T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!” idiots aren’t thinking about the issues the ad is addressing. Then again the author of this article knows that happy news doesn’t sell..I mean get people to read your articles, a scandal does. Hack

  • Pingback: FCKH8’s “F-Bomb Princess” video isn’t offensive—it’s exploitative. | Rebecca Hains()

  • CruisingTroll

    Here’s a mind blowing concept:

    Something CAN be TWO bad things at the same time. Once you grasp that simple idea, its not too difficult to wrap your noggin around the fact that this video is offensive AND exploitative.


    what Ginger Rogers said.